Hugo Vs Jekyll 2021, Compare Jekyll and Hexo and Hugo - features, pros, cons, and real-world usage from developers. Let's explore the key differences between Gatsby, Hugo, and Jekyll: Hugo vs. Compare Hugo vs Jekyll and choose the best tool for your project. For Jekyll, run jekyll serve, and for Hugo, hugo serve. . Compare Hugo vs Jekyll — the top static site generators of 2025. If you want something more easily understandable in terms of writing Liquid scripts and other integrations, such as with GitHub, Jekyll works fine. " I recently took on the task of creating a documentation site theme for two projects. Hugo The first time I used Hugo, it generated my blog so fast that I thought it was broken. Each has its own unique features and advantages. It can be used to build various types of websites. The two most popular open source choices are Hugo and Jekyll. From this developer’s perspective, Jekyll is a workable choice for simple sites without complicated organizational needs. As I'm learning Golang currently, I was eager to try it. Top 10 Open Source Side Projects You Can Build on a Weekend Comparison with Other Static Site Generators Hugo Hugo is another popular static site generator that boasts impressive speed and performance. Jekyll: The learning curve Hugo’s docs are harder to follow: As pointed out by Ben Congdon in his blog, Hugo follows a top-down engineering approach, where it tries to provide everything a user may need. Side-by-side analysis of features, pricing, pros and cons to help you choose the best option for your needs. Home Features Comparison of Gatsby vs Jekyll vs Hugo vs Nuxt. It's also the fastest and best available free website offering. Home Features Comparison of Gatsby vs Next. js, webpack and Babel. Nov 21, 2025 · Among the many available options, Jekyll and Hugo stand out as the two most widely used SSGs today. Hugo Compare Jekyll and Hugo - features, pros, cons, and real-world usage from developers. com, and both supported by our CMS. Hugo is written in Go and Jekyll is written in Ruby. Hugo vs Jekyll vs Middleman: What are the differences? Introduction: In the world of static site generators, Hugo, Jekyll, and Middleman are popular choices. atomashpolskiy on Feb 23, 2022 | prev | next [–] Hugo and Jekyll are both open source static site generators. devs to have issues understanding things early on. Check out the article :point_down: Psst! As an experienced programming teacher with over 15 years of building websites under my belt, I often get asked by students about static site generator options. js Next. Which is better. To create them, you’ll need template files that tell the site generator how to generate the HTML page. This is where Postwave differs from static blog engines like Jekyll or Hugo which take the Markdown posts and generate a site for you. The author of this piece (who works with me) is a Hugo fan. Personally, I use Jekyll but only because I've been using it a long time and old habits die hard. References How to Choose the Right Static Generator: Jekyll vs. Compared to Jekyll, it creates web pages extremely quickly. For example, Blog, Documentation, Portfolio, and many others. And some things like conditions are often a bit more complex than with Jekyll, for example. @chrisdmacrae wrote an additional article looking into the differences between these most popular SSGs and how they compare according to 6 different factors. Both Hugo and Jekyll use similar double-curly-brace syntax for accessing variables and looping through data in your templates. Hugo can be challenging, as both are powerful tools for creating static websites. Static site generators are appealing because they produce secure sites requiring little maintenance that are faster to serve than dynamically generated web pages. There are two main elements: the main content area, and the all-important sidebar menu. js vs Jekyll vs Hugo Next. I started Jekyll and it was a very good starting point for me to get better at html/css and a little bit of js. Hugo Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. That's its main benefit: speed. js Jekyll Jekyll is a simple, blog-aware, static site generator for personal, project, or organization sites. Notable adopters are Smashing Magazine, which migrated from WordPress to a Jamstack solution with Hugo in 2017, [7] and Cloudflare, which switched its Developer Docs from Gatsby to Hugo in 2022. I do believe Hugo's strange templating can cause jr. Discover the key features of the two SSGs, their differences and some typical use cases. A comparison of the pros and cons of Hugo and Jekyll, two very popular Static Site Generators, from the perspective of a user of both platforms who writes their own templates. 4 seconds manuelhuez on Jan 30, 2018 | parent [–] Compare Hugo vs. 16 votes, 14 comments. When comparing Jekyll vs Hugo, the Slant community recommends Jekyll for most people. Migrating from another static site generator to Hugo typically involves minimal effort as long as the content structure is aligned. While Jekyll, on the other hand, follows a bottom-up approach where it provides minimal tools and lets you build the rest. Nov 22, 2024 · Wondering whether to choose Hugo or Jekyll for your static site? Read on as we compare their strengths, weaknesses, and hosting options, helping you make an informed decision based on your preferences and project requirements. Jekyll in this comprehensive comparison for web developers, covering installation, performance, customization, extensibility, and use cases. Gatsby vs Hugo vs Jekyll: What are the differences? Gatsby, Hugo, and Jekyll are popular static site generators that help developers build fast and efficient websites. Both are powerful, stable, and trusted by developers across the world — but which one is perfect for your project? Material aluminum NUEVO POR GARANTIA Cannondale Jekyll modelo 2021 Enduro talla M Viña del Mar, VS Location is approximate Message Previously we benchmarked Hugo vs. Learn More Hugo and Jekyll are the leading static site generators according to StaticGen. If you run a Jekyll or Hugo site (or other), we would love to know what your build times are. Jekyll "Compare and choose between Gatsby, Docusaurus, Jekyll, and Hugo, the popular static site generators. In terms of scalability, however, Jekyll was not a good option imo. In typical Hugo vs Jekyll in direct comparison. Hugo vs. It is written in Go and offers a similar feature set to Jekyll. Nov 4, 2025 · Hugo vs Jekyll in direct comparison. It was a devastating affair for Jekyll. But they […] Wait who won? ? Both Hugo and Jekyll have their quirks and conveniences. To help you make the right choice, we look at how they compare. Explore Hugo vs. If you plan on having massive amounts of content and need to build fast, then sure, Hugo is your platform. I decided to test out (Go)Hugo after I built this site with Jekyll to compare the two. Hugo is great for all size sites — best for large sites (over 10,000 pages). js, Node. Choosing a static site generator? Compare Jekyll and Hugo side-by-side to find the best fit for your project. Top 10 Open Source Side Projects You Can Build on a Weekend Jekyll vs. Compare Jekyll vs Hugo. js is a free and open source web application framework based on React. Here are my thoughts. Jekyll. Hugo offers straightforward migration options, especially if you are already working with a static site generator or a traditional CMS. Written in Ruby by Tom Preston-Werner, GitHub's co-founder, it is distributed under the open source MIT license. js vs Jekyll vs Hugo vs Nuxt. The next generator would be Hugo in the future and I would update this post. In the question "What are the best static site generators that support markdown?" Jekyll is ranked 1st while Hugo is ranked 4th Compare Jekyll vs Hugo. If you’re looking to render some one-page posts in an available theme and host with GitHub Pages, Jekyll will get you up and running fairly quickly. Jekyll's templating language "clicked" better for me and I liked the documentation better, but Hugo's not missing anything. Both generators have passionate communities and allow you to create fast, secure sites without complex servers. That means Jekyll needs significantly more time than Hugo to build the same site. For example: Static Site Generator: Jekyll Approximate number of pages: 200 Build time: 3. Compare Jekyll and Pelican and Hugo - features, pros, cons, and real-world usage from developers. Discover key differences in speed, features, ease of use, and community support to choose the right SSG for your project. Flexibility Hugo is very flexible in terms of content structure. The world is probably big enough for both! Hugo vs Jekyll: Benchmarked We’ve also compared Jekyll & Hugo features across 6 dimensions. Has anyone tried Hugo, Hexo, Gatsby, GitBook or anything similar to Jekyll? What are the differences between Jekyll and what… All-in-all, Jekyll is a strong choice for small blogs, but there are some more modern options if you're looking at making blogging a long-term thing. If you are not familiar with it, you definitely have to learn it. Just Jekyll could be replaced by Hugo, if you care enough. Hugo: Choosing the Right Static Site Generator for Your Project Static site generators like Jekyll and Hugo have revolutionized web development by offering speed, security, and simplified workflows. Hugo and Jekyll are both open source static site generators. In the question "What are the best blogging platforms?" Hugo is ranked 1st while Jekyll is ranked 2nd Hugo is particularly noted for its speed, and Hugo's official website states it is "the world’s fastest framework for building websites". Jekyll using this comparison chart. I wish they'd include code samples for every single thing though - I am basic and have trouble figuring stuff out sometimes. Personally, I use Hugo. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. But the actual templating languages and supported features are quite different. Mar 4, 2021 · Jekyll and Hugo are great static site generators for creating lean Jamstack content. A technologist and industry executive takes a look at three popular static site generators, comparing and contrasting the pros and cons of each. It'll generate most personal blogs in milliseconds, taking around ~2ms Compare Hugo vs Jekyll. Jekyll is at least 3 times slower than Hugo. With dynamic web pages, a web framework installed on a server generates the page a user sees. Like Jekyll, Hugo generates static HTML files, making websites built with it fast and secure. Home Features Gatsby vs JAMstack frameworks Gatsby vs Jekyll vs Hugo Comparison of Gatsby vs Jekyll vs Hugo Jekyll Jekyll is a simple, blog-aware, static site generator for personal, project, or organization sites. Jekyll will still build a pretty large site of 1,500 pages or so in less than 10 seconds. Jekyll: If you're building a new website, a static site generator may be the right platform for you. We’re often asked which tool performs better so we decided Hugo doesn’t do too bad in that test. This has much more features. Can likely build 100,000 pages in same time Gatsby & Jekyll could build 1000. When comparing Hugo vs Jekyll, the Slant community recommends Hugo for most people. Chris wrote a great article looking into the differences between Hugo and Jekyll and how they compare according to 6 different factors. Choosing between Jekyll vs. Evaluate their features against your specific project requirements to decide which solution fits best. Go Templates are used for the setup of the pages. Use a git-based CMS like Forestry or Netlify CMS. It examines each in terms of features, performance, deployment, and more, helping you make the right choice for your web project. A user makes a request, the server queries a database, pulls out the information users want t Aug 29, 2024 · So while both are great static site generators, Hugo excels at more complex sites and speed while Jekyll stays simpler for beginners. Pros of using Hugo: The rank of speed among three generators are Hugo > Hexo > Jekyll. Jekyll Jekyll is a simple, blog-aware, static site generator for personal, project, or organization Let's compare how Hugo and Jekyll handle these factors. Both projects needed the same basic features, but one uses Jekyll while the other uses Hugo. Yes, it is. Check out the article 👇 Hugo vs Jekyll: Benchmarked We’ve also compared Jekyll & Hugo features across 6 dimensions. Comparison of Gatsby vs Next. In this Markdown code snippet, we will discuss the key differences between these three static site generators. For this showcase, I thought it would be interesting to compare the implementations of a template with both Jekyll and Hugo versions. js for building server-side rendered and/or static web applications using React. Check Jekyll vs Hugo comparison page for analysis of these two popular Site Generators. Hexo Static Gen Compare Jekyll and Hugo and VuePress - features, pros, cons, and real-world usage from developers. cb8cm, dhjprv, 9iey, 2htc, a0c7, 3vnkms, cgsmby, cryyd, jduji, mueg,